|
''Stockdale v Hansard'' (1839) 9 Ad & El 1 was a case in which the Parliament of the United Kingdom unsuccessfully challenged the common law of parliamentary privilege, leading to legislative reform. ==Facts== The Prisons Act 1835 had introduced the first national prison system in the United Kingdom, along with a regime of prison inspections. Whitworth Russell was one of the first inspectors and had been the reforming champion of the austere regime at the Millbank penitentiary.〔 In Newgate prison, Russell, and his fellow inspector William Crawford, had discovered a well-thumbed edition of John Roberton's ''On Diseases of the Generative System'' (1811), edited by Thomas Little, a pseudonym of John Joseph Stockdale. Roberton was a radical and something of an outsider to the medical profession while Stockdale was a notorious pornographer and the book had attracted some distaste on its publication for its explicit anatomical plates.〔McGrath (2002)〕 In 1836, official parliamentary reporter Hansard, by order of the House of Commons, printed and published a report stating that an indecent book published by a Mr. Stockdale was circulating in Newgate. Publication of such parliamentary papers for circulation among Members of Parliament (MPs) alone was, and still is, protected by absolute privilege under common law.〔''Lake v. King'' (1667) 1 Saunders 131〕 However, a further development from 1835 had resulted from MP Joseph Hume's campaign to make better use of the mass of parliamentary papers and to improve freedom of information by publishing parliamentary papers to the public.〔 The aldermen of the City of London who were responsible for Newgate were incensed. They saw Roberton's book as a scientific work but the inspectors affirmed their original description observing "We also applied to several medical booksellers, who all gave it the same character. They described it as 'one of Stockdale's obscene books.'"〔 Stockdale sued for £500 damages for libel, admitting that he had published the book but denying its obscenity. Stockdale sued as a pauper and Mr Justice Park assigned him counsel. Attorney-General Sir John Campbell appeared for Hansard. The first trial took place in 1837 before Lord Denman and a jury. Denman dismissed Campbell's defence that the publication was privileged and the jury had only to consider the defence that the published statement had been true and the book indeed indecent. When they first returned, the jury foreman said that they found the book indecent and obscene but did not all agree that it was disgusting and wished to award Stockdale a farthing in damages. After a rebuke from Lord Denman on their faulty logic, the jury briefly conferred and found for Hansard.〔 Stockdale now found a copy of the City aldermen's response to the original report and sued again〔 but Hansard was ordered by the House to plead that he had acted under order of the Commons and was protected by parliamentary privilege. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Stockdale v Hansard」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|